Saiko; Alfons
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Saiko; Alfons.The latest application filed is for "amusement device".
- Saiko; Alfons - Oberrieden CH
- Saiko; Alfons - CH-8942 Oberrieden CH
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Amusement device Grant 6,397,756 - Saiko , et al. June 4, 2 | 2002-06-04 |
| Braking system for an amusement device Grant 6,062,350 - Spieldiener , et al. May 16, 2 | 2000-05-16 |
| Amusement device in the form of a roller coaster, a monorail or the like Grant 5,947,030 - Spieldiener , et al. September 7, 1 | 1999-09-07 |
| Amusement ride with at least one longitudinal guide with a passenger vehicle capable of changes in height Grant 5,628,690 - Spieldiener , et al. May 13, 1 | 1997-05-13 |
| Monorail transport system Grant 5,219,395 - Spieldiener , et al. June 15, 1 | 1993-06-15 |
| Rapid river ride boat Grant 4,696,251 - Spieldiener , et al. September 29, 1 | 1987-09-29 |
| Amusement ride including a rotating loading terminal Grant 4,543,886 - Spieldiener , et al. October 1, 1 | 1985-10-01 |
| Amusement ride raft Grant 4,516,943 - Spieldiener , et al. May 14, 1 | 1985-05-14 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 