S.S. Steiner, Inc.
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for S.s. Steiner, Inc.. S.s. Steiner, Inc. has 30 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "SALVOPLUS"
- Company Aliases
- S. S. STEINER, INC.
- S.S. Steiner, Inc.
- S.S. Steiner, Inc. - New York NY US
- S.S. STEINER, INC. - New York NY US
- S.S. Steiner, Inc.; - US
- S.S. STEINER, INC. - 655 Madison Avenue New York NY
| State Incorporated | NEW JERSEY |
| Entity Type | CORPORATION |
| Address | 725 5th Avenue, 23rd Floor New York, NEW YORK UNITED STATES 10022 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| MICROWAVE-ASSISTED DECARBOXYLATION OF ORGANIC ACIDS IN HEMP MATERIALS 20220234976 - 17/611643 Maye; John Paul ; et al. | 2022-07-28 |
| DECARBOXYLATION OF CANNABIDIOLIC ACID IN HEMP BIOMASS & HEMP EXTRACT 20180016216 - 15/633555 Leker; Jeremy ; et al. | 2018-01-18 |
| NOVEL HOP POWDERS 20140255587 - 14/198196 Leker; Jeremy ; et al. | 2014-09-11 |
| PLANT WASH 20130210626 - 13/829128 Ellis; Roger Rolland | 2013-08-15 |
| HOP PLANT NAMED "01051" 20060218684 - 11/344246 Jeske; Roger D. ; et al. | 2006-09-28 |
| NCAGE Code | 49GG3 | S S STEINER INC |
| CAGE Code | 49GG3 | S S STEINER, INC |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 