Ryder; John Kenneth
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ryder; John Kenneth.The latest application filed is for "flexible stent having protruding hinges".
- Ryder; John Kenneth - Pleasanton CA US
- - Pleasanton CA US
- Ryder; John Kenneth - Coral Springs FL
- Ryder; John Kenneth - Round Rock TX
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Flexible stent having protruding hinges Grant 8,920,489 - Baillargeon , et al. December 30, 2 | 2014-12-30 |
| Flexible stent having protruding hinges Grant 08920489 - | 2014-12-30 |
| Fixed wire dilatation catheter with an elongateable distal end Grant 8,852,223 - Ryder , et al. October 7, 2 | 2014-10-07 |
| Flexible Stent Having Protruding Hinges App 20120029623 - BAILLARGEON; BRIAN P. ; et al. | 2012-02-02 |
| Fixed Wire Dilatation Catheter With An Elongateable Distal End App 20080249465 - Ryder; John Kenneth ; et al. | 2008-10-09 |
| Altering heart valve leaflet attachment geometry to influence the location and magnitude of maximum loaded stress on the leaflet Grant 6,613,086 - Moe , et al. September 2, 2 | 2003-09-02 |
| System for implanting prosthetic heart valves App 20030109921 - Moe, Riyad ; et al. | 2003-06-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 