loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ruszczyk; Chester A..The latest application filed is for "method for reducing interference from initializing network devices in a data-over-cable system".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Method for reducing interference from initializing network devices in a data-over-cable system Grant 6,940,874 - Ruszczyk , et al. September 6, 2 | 2005-09-06 |
Method for reducing interference from initializing network devices in a data-over-cable system App 20020101883 - Ruszczyk, Chester A. ;   et al. | 2002-08-01 |
Method of scheduling higher and lower priority data packets Grant 6,205,150 - Ruszczyk March 20, 2 | 2001-03-20 |
System, device, and method for contention-based reservation in a shared medium network Grant 5,960,000 - Ruszczyk , et al. September 28, 1 | 1999-09-28 |
System, device, and method for sharing contention mini-slots among multiple priority classes Grant 5,886,993 - Ruszczyk , et al. March 23, 1 | 1999-03-23 |
Method, device and router for providing a contention-based reservation mechanism within a mini-slotted dynamic entry polling slot supporting multiple service classes Grant 5,615,212 - Ruszczyk , et al. March 25, 1 | 1997-03-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.