Rustick Joseph M
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Rustick Joseph M. Rustick Joseph M has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "CRICOSTAT"
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| PULSE OXIMETER SENSOR 20110152648 - 12/643659 Rustick; Joseph M. | 2011-06-23 |
| ELECTRONIC COMPONENT DEACTIVATION DEVICE 20110107934 - 12/616704 Rustick; Joseph M. | 2011-05-12 |
| FLAT ELECTRIC MATCH 20090266259 - 12/108831 Rustick; Joseph M. ; et al. | 2009-10-29 |
| Detachable gun barrel assembly 7,076,904 - 10/453,205 Rustick July 18, 2 | 2006-07-18 |
| Muzzle attachment for barrel of gas-operated weapon 5,831,202 - 08/822,939 Rustick November 3, 1 | 1998-11-03 |
| Attachment for affixation to the barrel of a gas operated weapon 5,768,818 - 08/797,040 Rustick June 23, 1 | 1998-06-23 |
| Sight mount providing adjustable eye relief 5,375,361 - 08/096,596 Rustick December 27, 1 | 1994-12-27 |
| Laser boresight for the sighting in of a gun 5,365,669 - 07/996,088 Rustick , et al. November 22, 1 | 1994-11-22 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"CRICOSTAT" 74545404 |
CRICOSTAT 1994-07-05 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 