Rupiper; Stan
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Rupiper; Stan.The latest application filed is for "helice pier coupling system used for soil stabilization".
- Rupiper; Stan - Tahoma CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Helice pierhead mounting plate and bolt assembly Grant 7,004,683 - Rupiper February 28, 2 | 2006-02-28 |
| Helice pier coupling system used for soil stabilization Grant 6,615,554 - Rupiper September 9, 2 | 2003-09-09 |
| Helice pier coupling system used for soil stabilization App 20030041535 - Rupiper, Stan | 2003-03-06 |
| Concrete foundation pierhead and method of lifting a foundation using a jack assembly Grant 6,503,024 - Rupiper January 7, 2 | 2003-01-07 |
| Concrete foundation pierhead and method of lifting a foundation using a jack assembly App 20010046415 - Rupiper, Stan | 2001-11-29 |
| Ground anchor device Grant 5,934,836 - Rupiper , et al. August 10, 1 | 1999-08-10 |
| Ground anchor device for penetrating an underground rock formation Grant 5,919,005 - Rupiper July 6, 1 | 1999-07-06 |
| Drive device used for soil stabilization Grant 5,904,447 - Sutton , et al. May 18, 1 | 1999-05-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 