loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Roy; Sudipta.The latest application filed is for "apparatus and method for detecting lesion in brain magnetic resonance image, and computer-readable recording medium for implementing the method".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Apparatus and method for detecting lesion in brain magnetic resonance image, and computer-readable recording medium for implementing the method App 20170143207 - Roy; Sudipta ;   et al. | 2017-05-25 |
Method and apparatus for catalytic cracking Grant 8,840,846 - Bhattacharyya , et al. September 23, 2 | 2014-09-23 |
Method And Apparatus For Catalytic Cracking App 20130020234 - Bhattacharyya; Debasis ;   et al. | 2013-01-24 |
Process for manufacturing micro- and nano- devices Grant 7,776,227 - Roy August 17, 2 | 2010-08-17 |
Process for preparation of liquefied petroleum gas selective cracking catalyst Grant 7,517,827 - Ravichandran , et al. April 14, 2 | 2009-04-14 |
Process for Manufacturing Micro-and Nano-Devices App 20080283501 - Roy; Sudipta | 2008-11-20 |
Process for preparation of liquefied petroleum gas selective cracking catalyst App 20070203017 - Ravichandran; Gopal ;   et al. | 2007-08-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.