Rowe; Murray A.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Rowe; Murray A..The latest application filed is for "vibrator truss assembly".
- Rowe; Murray A. - Canton SD
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Vibrator truss assembly Grant 6,234,713 - Rowe , et al. May 22, 2 | 2001-05-22 |
| Vibrating compactor assembly for use with a concrete finishing machine Grant 5,791,815 - Rowe August 11, 1 | 1998-08-11 |
| Concrete finishing machine with vibrating finishing rollers Grant 4,993,869 - Ulmer , et al. February 19, 1 | 1991-02-19 |
| Concrete finishing machine with vibrating compactor unit Grant 4,775,262 - Guntharp , et al. October 4, 1 | 1988-10-04 |
| Concrete finishing machine with adjustable auger unit Grant 4,708,520 - Rowe November 24, 1 | 1987-11-24 |
| Pavers Grant 4,484,834 - Rowe , et al. November 27, 1 | 1984-11-27 |
| Concrete vibrator machine Grant 4,320,987 - Rowe , et al. March 23, 1 | 1982-03-23 |
| Concrete vibrator machine Grant 4,256,415 - Rowe , et al. March 17, 1 | 1981-03-17 |
| Concrete finishing machines Grant 4,068,970 - Rowe January 17, 1 | 1978-01-17 |
| Concrete Finishing Machines Grant 3,593,627 - Rowe , et al. July 20, 1 | 1971-07-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 