Rother, Peter
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Rother, Peter.The latest application filed is for "rotating anode x-ray tube".
- Rother, Peter - Baiersdorf DE
- Rother; Peter - Deckenpfronn DE
- Rother; Peter - Los Altos CA
- Rother; Peter - Lahr DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Rotating anode x-ray tube App 20050002492 - Rother, Peter ; et al. | 2005-01-06 |
| Rotary piston tube for an x-ray radiator App 20040258208 - Lenz, Eberhard ; et al. | 2004-12-23 |
| High-capacity x-ray tube App 20040252808 - Lenz, Eberhard ; et al. | 2004-12-16 |
| X-ray beam emission window for vacuum tubes App 20040228448 - Rother, Peter ; et al. | 2004-11-18 |
| Vacuum enclosure for a vacuum tube tube having an X-ray window App 20020075999 - Rother, Peter | 2002-06-20 |
| System for measuring a blood parameter and method therefor Grant 5,522,389 - Fischer , et al. June 4, 1 | 1996-06-04 |
| Method for processing signals, particularly for oximetric measurements on living human tissue Grant 5,113,861 - Rother May 19, 1 | 1992-05-19 |
| Suspension devices for the chassis of a recording and/or reproducing apparatus Grant 4,098,513 - Klapproth , et al. July 4, 1 | 1978-07-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 