Ross; Bill
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ross; Bill.The latest application filed is for "electrolysis cell and internal combustion engine kit comprising the same".
- Ross; Bill - Newmarket CA
- Ross; Bill - San Francisco CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Electrolysis cell and internal combustion engine kit comprising the same App 20070074680 - Ross; Bill | 2007-04-05 |
| Electrolysis cell and internal combustion engine kit comprising the same Grant 7,143,722 - Ross December 5, 2 | 2006-12-05 |
| Simultaneous network news distribution Grant 7,069,245 - Messick , et al. June 27, 2 | 2006-06-27 |
| Electrolysis cell and internal combustion engine kit comprising the same App 20050199509 - Ross, Bill | 2005-09-15 |
| Electrolysis cell and internal combustion engine kit comprising the same Grant 6,896,789 - Ross May 24, 2 | 2005-05-24 |
| Simultaneous network news distribution App 20040158533 - Messick, Steve ; et al. | 2004-08-12 |
| Electrolysis cell and internal combustion engine kit comprising the same App 20020179454 - Ross, Bill | 2002-12-05 |
| Internal combustion engine kit with electrolysis cell Grant 6,209,493 - Ross April 3, 2 | 2001-04-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 