Roos; Nelson
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Roos; Nelson.The latest application filed is for "spectacle temple for lens".
- Roos; Nelson - Baltimore MD
- Roos; Nelson - Charlottesville VA
- Roos; Nelson - Canton MI
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Spectacle temple for lens App 20090201460 - Blum; Ronald D. ; et al. | 2009-08-13 |
| Configurable pivoting cage cargo retainer Grant 7,488,021 - Roos , et al. February 10, 2 | 2009-02-10 |
| Break away hinge for spectacles App 20080129953 - Blum; Ronald D. ; et al. | 2008-06-05 |
| Spectacle hinge for providing on off power App 20080106694 - Blum; Ronald D. ; et al. | 2008-05-08 |
| Universal endpiece for spectacle temples App 20080100792 - Blum; Ronald D. ; et al. | 2008-05-01 |
| Vehicle tailgate having supplemental tailgate assembly Grant 7,347,473 - Miller , et al. March 25, 2 | 2008-03-25 |
| Pivoting cage cargo retainer for pick-up trucks Grant 7,111,886 - Miller , et al. September 26, 2 | 2006-09-26 |
| Vehicle tailgate having supplemental tailgate assembly App 20050088848 - Miller, Scott ; et al. | 2005-04-28 |
| Tailgate lift assist system Grant 6,820,910 - Tan , et al. November 23, 2 | 2004-11-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 