loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Roffelsen; Franciscus.The latest application filed is for "method for feeding a closed liquid system".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Non-return valve Grant 6,968,863 - Roffelsen November 29, 2 | 2005-11-29 |
Method for manufacturing a double-walled heat exchanging tube with leak detection Grant 6,926,069 - Roffelsen August 9, 2 | 2005-08-09 |
Method for feeding a closed liquid system App 20040244847 - Roffelsen, Franciscus | 2004-12-09 |
Heat exchanger tube and method of manufacturing same Grant 6,192,583 - Roffelsen February 27, 2 | 2001-02-27 |
Fixing device for mounting objects on supports Grant 4,747,737 - Roffelsen May 31, 1 | 1988-05-31 |
Heat exchanger duct with heat exchange wiring Grant 4,655,282 - Roffelsen April 7, 1 | 1987-04-07 |
Method and apparatus for reducing the gas content of a liquid Grant 4,645,518 - Roffelsen February 24, 1 | 1987-02-24 |
Method of and apparatus for the degasification of circulation systems for liquids Grant 4,456,172 - Roffelsen June 26, 1 | 1984-06-26 |
Apparatus for venting and/or degassing a pipeline system Grant 4,381,928 - Roffelsen May 3, 1 | 1983-05-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.