loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Roehrs; Robert E..The latest application filed is for "ophthalmic solution".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Ophthalmic solution Grant 5,209,927 - Gressel , et al. * May 11, 1 | 1993-05-11 |
Ophthalmic carboxy vinyl polymer gel for dry eye syndrome Grant 5,075,104 - Gressel , et al. December 24, 1 | 1991-12-24 |
Topical ophthalmic compositions containing microfine retinoid particles Grant 4,966,773 - Gressel , et al. October 30, 1 | 1990-10-30 |
Topical ophthalmic compositions containing one or more retinoids Grant 4,826,871 - Gressel , et al. May 2, 1 | 1989-05-02 |
Nonirritating aqueous ophthalmic compositions comfort formulation for ocular therapeutic agents Grant 4,559,343 - Han , et al. December 17, 1 | 1985-12-17 |
Tissue irrigating solution Grant 4,550,022 - Garabedian , et al. October 29, 1 | 1985-10-29 |
Ophthmalic irrigating solution Grant 4,443,432 - Garabedian , et al. April 17, 1 | 1984-04-17 |
Sustained release ophthalmic drug dosage Grant 4,407,792 - Schoenwald , et al. October 4, 1 | 1983-10-04 |
Sustained release ophthalmic drug dosage Grant 4,271,143 - Schoenwald , et al. June 2, 1 | 1981-06-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.