loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Roe; Thomas O..The latest application filed is for "dual purpose clamp for securing aftertreatment housing joints".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Dual purpose clamp for securing aftertreatment housing joints Grant 9,926,956 - Horton , et al. March 27, 2 | 2018-03-27 |
Dual Purpose Clamp For Securing Aftertreatment Housing Joints App 20170241455 - Horton; Bradley ;   et al. | 2017-08-24 |
Exhaust system with spin-capture retention of aftertreatment element Grant 7,441,334 - Roe , et al. October 28, 2 | 2008-10-28 |
Annular Self-supporting, Self-indexing Gasket And Joint For Use Of Same App 20080136117 - Roe; Thomas O. ;   et al. | 2008-06-12 |
Tapered Annular Gasket And Joint For Use Of Same App 20080136172 - Roe; Thomas O. ;   et al. | 2008-06-12 |
Exhaust system with spin-capture retention of aftertreatment element App 20060245986 - Roe; Thomas O. ;   et al. | 2006-11-02 |
Coupled acoustic echo cancellation system Grant 6,496,581 - Finn , et al. December 17, 2 | 2002-12-17 |
Muffler hanger system Grant 6,481,673 - Roe , et al. November 19, 2 | 2002-11-19 |
Simplified communication system Grant 6,295,364 - Finn , et al. September 25, 2 | 2001-09-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.