Trademark applications and grants for Rodgers James Neil. Rodgers James Neil has 8 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "ESSENCE BASED SEARCH ENGINE"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Essence based search engine 20090037408 - 11/833988 Rodgers; James Neil | 2009-02-05 |
Collectable Cop/Spot Chip 20080291020 - 11/752062 Rodgers; James Neil | 2008-11-27 |
Chip Referee 20080281443 - 11/747904 Rodgers; James Neil | 2008-11-13 |
Body Chip 20080266107 - 11/741760 Rodgers; James Neil | 2008-10-30 |
Secure Self Scan 20080258877 - 11/736245 Rodgers; James Neil | 2008-10-23 |
Stolen bicycle (missing chattel) identification, tracking and location; a system and method 8,988,222 - 11/624,215 Rodgers March 24, 2 | 2015-03-24 |
Stolen bicycle (missing chattel) identification, tracking and location; a system and method 8,988,222 - 11/624,215 Rodgers March 24, 2 | 2015-03-24 |
RFID tracking of chose in action 8,823,522 - 11/689,316 Rodgers September 2, 2 | 2014-09-02 |
RFID tracking of chose in action 8,823,522 - 11/689,316 Rodgers September 2, 2 | 2014-09-02 |
Precisely tuned RFID antenna 7,997,495 - 11/686,946 Rodgers August 16, 2 | 2011-08-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.