Rocep Lusol Holdings L T D
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Rocep Lusol Holdings L T D. Rocep Lusol Holdings L T D has 3 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "LINROC"
- Company Aliases
- Rocep Lusol Holdings Limited
- ROCEP LUSOL HOLDINGS LTD.
- Rocep-Lusol Holdings Limited
- Rocep Lusol Holdings Ltd. - Glasgow GB
- Rocep Lusol Holdings Limited - Glasgow GB
- ROCEP LUSOL HOLDINGS LIMITED - Renfrew GB
- Rocep Lusol Holdings Limited -
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| DISPENSING APPARATUS 20200231368 - MAGUIRE; Jordan ; et al. | 2020-07-23 |
| DISPENSING VALVE FOR PRESSURE PACK 20190168242 - 16/324215 MAGUIRE; Jordan ; et al. | 2019-06-06 |
| Apparatus for Controlling Flow Rate from a Valve Dispenser 20080230566 - 10/590560 Frutin; Bernard Derek | 2008-09-25 |
| Dispensing apparatus 20050011914 - 10/895566 Frutin, Bernard Derek | 2005-01-20 |
| Dispensing apparatus 20030052137 - 10/284684 Frutin, Bernard Derek | 2003-03-20 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"LINROC" 3288586 78332986 |
LINROC 2003-11-25 |
"GIZMO" 78087151 |
GIZMO 2001-10-05 |
"POLYGAS" 74193771 |
POLYGAS 1991-08-09 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 