loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Robey; Timothy.The latest application filed is for "position indicator apparatus and method".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Position indicator apparatus and method Grant 7,564,349 - Robey July 21, 2 | 2009-07-21 |
Position Indicator Apparatus And Method App 20080015733 - Robey; Timothy | 2008-01-17 |
Storage system with access control system Grant 7,316,536 - Evans , et al. January 8, 2 | 2008-01-08 |
Storage system with access control system App 20040208731 - Evans, James V ;   et al. | 2004-10-21 |
Vertical carousel with top and side access stations App 20040101386 - Robey, Timothy | 2004-05-27 |
Vertical carousel and vertical lift module position indicator system Grant 6,715,910 - Robey April 6, 2 | 2004-04-06 |
Horizontal carousel position light system Grant 6,663,273 - Robey December 16, 2 | 2003-12-16 |
Horizontal carousel position light system App 20030156427 - Robey, Timothy | 2003-08-21 |
Vertical carousel and vertical lift module position indicator system App 20030156428 - Robey, Timothy | 2003-08-21 |
NCAGE Code | 65PE6 | ROBEY TIMOTHY!DBA ROBEY CONTROLS |
CAGE Code | 65PE6 | ROBEY, TIMOTHY ROBEY CONTROLS |
DUNS | 193659278 | ROBEY, TIMOTHY |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.