Trademark applications and grants for Robertson, Shawn. Robertson, Shawn has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "PODMIER"
Entity Type | INDIVIDUAL |
Address | 233 Lady diana Dr davenport, FLORIDA UNITED STATES 33837 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Workpiece handling end-effector and a method for processing workpieces using a workpiece handling end-effector 20040174029 - 10/801404 McNurlin, Randy ;   et al. | 2004-09-09 |
Workpiece handling end-effector and a method for processing workpieces using a workpiece handling end-effector 20030092358 - 10/040996 McNurlin, Randy ;   et al. | 2003-05-15 |
Workpiece handling end-effector and a method for processing workpieces using a workpiece handling end-effector 6,979,034 - 10/801,404 McNurlin , et al. December 27, 2 | 2005-12-27 |
Workpiece handling end-effector and a method for processing workpieces using a workpiece handling end-effector 6,752,442 - 10/040,996 McNurlin , et al. June 22, 2 | 2004-06-22 |
Car air freshener D403,759 - D/087,563 Robertson January 5, 1 | 1999-01-05 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "PODMIER" 97542787 |
PODMIER 2022-08-10 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.