Robertson; Jeffrey Charles
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Robertson; Jeffrey Charles.The latest application filed is for "security device".
- Robertson; Jeffrey Charles - Rochester NY US
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Security device Grant 8,646,198 - Atherton , et al. February 11, 2 | 2014-02-11 |
| Friction adjuster for window balance carriers Grant 8,365,356 - Robertson February 5, 2 | 2013-02-05 |
| Security Device App 20110147256 - Atherton; Peter Samuel ; et al. | 2011-06-23 |
| Friction Adjuster for Window Balance Carriers App 20070101652 - Robertson; Jeffrey Charles | 2007-05-10 |
| Spring Wiper for Curl Spring Balances App 20070101654 - Robertson; Jeffrey Charles | 2007-05-10 |
| Window balance system App 20060225363 - Dallas; Tobias Peter ; et al. | 2006-10-12 |
| Slotted extruded inverted carrier with improved pin ingress and egress App 20050229492 - Robertson, Jeffrey Charles | 2005-10-20 |
| Valve system having tapered sealing portions Grant 6,149,129 - Harris , et al. November 21, 2 | 2000-11-21 |
| Valve system Grant 6,079,444 - Harris , et al. June 27, 2 | 2000-06-27 |
| Valve system Grant 5,878,798 - Harris , et al. March 9, 1 | 1999-03-09 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 