Robel; Frauke

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Robel; Frauke.The latest application filed is for "system for the release of equal proportions of two flowable substances, especially for dental purposes".

Company Profile

0.2.3

Robel; Frauke - Hamburg DE

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Method and device for generating a multi-component compound Grant 6,932,237 - Heymann , et al. August 23, 2	2005-08-23
System for the release of equal proportions of two flowable substances, especially for dental purposes Grant 6,824,016 - Muhlbauer , et al. November 30, 2	2004-11-30
System for the release of equal proportions of two flowable substances, especially for dental purposes App 20040011816 - Muhlbauer, Wolfgang ; et al.	2004-01-22
Method and device for generating a multi-component compound App 20030022128 - Heymann, Rudolf ; et al.	2003-01-30
System for the release of equal proportions of two flowable substances, especially for dental purposes App 20020042591 - Muhlbauer, Wolfgang ; et al.	2002-04-11

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.