Trademark applications and grants for Rinner James A. Rinner James A has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "BIPOD"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Multiple Fulcrum Cutter 20210145496 - 17/159112 Rinner; James A. | 2021-05-20 |
TOOL HOLDER WITH COILED SPRINGS 20190366447 - 16/541625 Rinner; James A. | 2019-12-05 |
MULTIPLE FULCRUM BENDER 20190307497 - 16/450795 Rinner; James A. | 2019-10-10 |
Surgical Ratcheting Assembly 20190269448 - 16/417175 Rinner; James A. | 2019-09-05 |
TOOL HOLDER WITH COILED SPRINGS 20170246693 - 15/442599 Rinner; James A. | 2017-08-31 |
Open shear handle D959,943 - D/712,696 Burnap , et al. August 9, 2 | 2022-08-09 |
Open shear handle D959,943 - D/712,696 Burnap , et al. August 9, 2 | 2022-08-09 |
Surgical ratcheting assembly 11,395,689 - 16/417,175 Rinner July 26, 2 | 2022-07-26 |
Multiple fulcrum bender 11,298,171 - 16/450,795 Rinner April 12, 2 | 2022-04-12 |
Multiple fulcrum cutter 10,905,488 - 15/417,647 Rinner February 2, 2 | 2021-02-02 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "BIPOD" 86233123 |
BIPOD 2014-03-26 |
![]() "EVOLUTION" 78321358 |
EVOLUTION 2003-10-31 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.