Rimkevich; Vitaliy
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Rimkevich; Vitaliy.The latest application filed is for "refrigeration appliance comprising a supply pipe for water".
- Rimkevich; Vitaliy - Giengen DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Refrigeration appliance comprising a water circuit Grant 9,927,166 - Faehnle , et al. March 27, 2 | 2018-03-27 |
| Refrigeration appliance comprising a supply pipe for water Grant 9,874,881 - Faehnle , et al. January 23, 2 | 2018-01-23 |
| Refrigeration appliance comprising a water supply connection Grant 9,863,678 - Faehnle , et al. January 9, 2 | 2018-01-09 |
| Multifunctional module for a refrigerating apparatus Grant 9,561,948 - Fahnle , et al. February 7, 2 | 2017-02-07 |
| Refrigeration appliance comprising a supply pipe for water App 20160085245 - FAEHNLE; ELMAR ; et al. | 2016-03-24 |
| Refrigeration Appliance Comprising A Water Supply Connection App 20160076801 - FAEHNLE; ELMAR ; et al. | 2016-03-17 |
| Refrigeration Appliance Comprising A Water Circuit App 20160054048 - FAEHNLE; ELMAR ; et al. | 2016-02-25 |
| Multifunctional Module For A Refrigerating Apparatus App 20150027153 - FAHNLE; Elmar ; et al. | 2015-01-29 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 