loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Richter; Jan Helge.The latest application filed is for "implantable electrode lead with conductors connected to form a braid".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Implantable Electrode Lead with Conductors Connected to Form a Braid App 20220296888 - Richter; Jan Helge | 2022-09-22 |
Device For Delivering Energy And/or Measuring Electrical Activity App 20200338319 - BLUEMEL; Chritian ;   et al. | 2020-10-29 |
Electrode Element For Electromedical Therapy In A Human Or Animal Body App 20150328448 - Richter; Jan Helge ;   et al. | 2015-11-19 |
Conductive coil arrangement and electrode catheter arrangement, in particular for cardiac therapy Grant 8,755,908 - Jadwizak , et al. June 17, 2 | 2014-06-17 |
Conductive Coil Arrangement and Electrode Catheter Arrangement, in Particular for Cardiac Therapy App 20130150941 - Jadwizak; Detmar ;   et al. | 2013-06-13 |
Ablation catheter for the generation of linear lesions in the myocardium Grant 6,595,991 - Tollner , et al. July 22, 2 | 2003-07-22 |
Ablation catheter for the generation of linear lesions in the myocardium App 20010031942 - Tollner, Thomas ;   et al. | 2001-10-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.