loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Richard; Daniel J..The latest application filed is for "armored window system".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Armored window system Grant 8,037,802 - Ciriscioli , et al. October 18, 2 | 2011-10-18 |
Armored Window System App 20110226122 - Ciriscioli; Peter R. ;   et al. | 2011-09-22 |
Footwear architecture(s) and associated closure systems Grant 7,685,747 - Gasparovic , et al. March 30, 2 | 2010-03-30 |
Footwear Grant D560,890 - Norton , et al. February 5, 2 | 2008-02-05 |
Footwear Grant D559,514 - Norton , et al. January 15, 2 | 2008-01-15 |
Footwear Grant D559,516 - Norton , et al. January 15, 2 | 2008-01-15 |
Footwear Grant D559,515 - Norton , et al. January 15, 2 | 2008-01-15 |
Shoe sole construction containing a composite plate Grant 5,611,152 - Richard , et al. March 18, 1 | 1997-03-18 |
Asymmetric shoe Grant 4,876,806 - Robinson , et al. October 31, 1 | 1989-10-31 |
Athletic shoe for aerobic exercise and the like Grant 4,736,531 - Richard April 12, 1 | 1988-04-12 |
Article of footwear with an adjustable width, adjustable tension closure system Grant 4,553,342 - Derderian , et al. November 19, 1 | 1985-11-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.