Rfpc Holding Corp
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Rfpc Holding Corp. Rfpc Holding Corp has 6 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "BC"
- Company Aliases
- RFPC Holding Corp.
- RFPC Holding Corporation
- RFPC HOLDING CORP. - Wilmerding PA US
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| FLANGED BRAKE SHOE 20220126892 - 17/427783 Bowden; A. Gary | 2022-04-28 |
| FRICTION DEVICE WITH BONDING INSERTS 20220049749 - 17/514074 Bowden; Alan Gary | 2022-02-17 |
| SHAPED FRICTION DEVICE 20220042561 - 17/507198 Bowden; Alan Gary | 2022-02-10 |
| FRICTION DEVICE WITH REDUCED VOLUME 20220042560 - 17/511051 Bowden; Alan Gary | 2022-02-10 |
| BRAKE SHOE WITH MULTI-FUNCTION METAL INSERT 20110132705 - 13/056008 Rumph; Timothy A. ; et al. | 2011-06-09 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"BC" 98239868 |
BC 2023-10-25 |
"BEAMCENTERING" 98239898 |
BEAMCENTERING 2023-10-25 |
"FLANGEGUARD" 98239829 |
FLANGEGUARD 2023-10-25 |
"HICAP" 3965665 85134581 |
HICAP 2010-09-21 |
"HICAP" 78679694 |
HICAP 2005-07-27 |
"TREADGUARD" 2997428 78401481 |
TREADGUARD 2004-04-14 |
| SEC | 0001750801 | RFPC Holding Corp. of DELAWARE |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 