Reznikov; Naum
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Reznikov; Naum.The latest application filed is for "disk drive bracket".
- Reznikov; Naum - Fremont CA
- Reznikov; Naum - San Francisco CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Hard disk drive bracket Grant 8,045,326 - Reznikov October 25, 2 | 2011-10-25 |
| Electronic equipment module with latching injector/ejector Grant 7,264,490 - Reznikov September 4, 2 | 2007-09-04 |
| Inject/eject mechanism for circuit boards Grant 7,251,145 - Reznikov July 31, 2 | 2007-07-31 |
| Board interlock ejection system Grant 7,180,755 - Reznikov February 20, 2 | 2007-02-20 |
| Component removal apparatus Grant 7,106,596 - Reznikov September 12, 2 | 2006-09-12 |
| Disk drive bracket Grant 6,798,650 - Reznikov , et al. September 28, 2 | 2004-09-28 |
| Disk drive bracket App 20020050552 - Reznikov, Naum ; et al. | 2002-05-02 |
| Disk drive bracket Grant 6,067,225 - Reznikov , et al. May 23, 2 | 2000-05-23 |
| Locking standoff for circuit boards Grant 5,223,674 - Reznikov June 29, 1 | 1993-06-29 |
| Modular storage container for diskettes Grant 5,016,946 - Reznikov , et al. May 21, 1 | 1991-05-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 