RetroVascular Inc.
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Retrovascular Inc.. Retrovascular Inc. has 11 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "PLASMACATH"
- Company Aliases
- RetroVascular Inc.
- RetroVascular, Inc.
- RETROVASCULAR, INC. - Pleasanton CA US
- Retrovascular, Inc. - Pleasanton CA US
- RetroVascular, Inc. - Pleasanton CA US
| State Incorporated | DELAWARE |
| Entity Type | CORPORATION |
| Address | 5994 W. Las Positas Blvd. Suite 209 Pleasanton, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 94588 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| BI-POLAR TISSUE ABLATION DEVICE AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF 20190298442 - 16/316568 OGATA; Wayne ; et al. | 2019-10-03 |
| ENERGY FACILITATED COMPOSITION DELIVERY 20170100192 - 15/389589 Ogata; Wayne ; et al. | 2017-04-13 |
| RADIOFREQUENCY GUIDEWIRE WITH CONTROLLED PLASMA GENERATION AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF 20160235463 - 15/047246 Ogata; Wayne ; et al. | 2016-08-18 |
| RECANALIZING OCCLUDED VESSELS USING RADIOFREQUENCY ENERGY 20160135881 - 15/003098 Katoh; Osamu ; et al. | 2016-05-19 |
| REDIRECTING DELIVERY CATHETER AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF 20160106499 - 14/887940 Ogata; Wayne ; et al. | 2016-04-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 