Ren; Ruihua

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ren; Ruihua.The latest application filed is for "markers linked to reniform nematode resistance".

Company Profile

6.10.14

Ren; Ruihua - Carmel IN
Ren; Ruihua - Westfield IN

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Maize cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) S-type restorer Rf3 gene, molecular markers and their use Grant 11,363,768 - Ren , et al. June 21, 2	2022-06-21
Markers Linked To Reniform Nematode Resistance App 20220025471 - Buyyarapu; Ramesh ; et al.	2022-01-27
Markers linked to reniform nematode resistance Grant 11,136,630 - Buyyarapu , et al. October 5, 2	2021-10-05
Molecular markers associated with Orobanche resistance in sunflower Grant 10,883,148 - Gao , et al. January 5, 2	2021-01-05
MAIZE CYTOPLASMIC MALE STERILITY (CMS) S-TYPE RESTORER GENE Rf3 App 20200255855 - REN; Ruihua ; et al.	2020-08-13
Maize cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) S-type restorer gene Rf3 Grant 10,626,412 - Ren , et al.	2020-04-21
MALE CYTOPLASMIC MALE STERILITY (CMS) S-TYPE RESTORER Rf3 GENE, MOLECULAR MARKERS AND THEIR USE App 20190373830 - REN; Ruihua ; et al.	2019-12-12
Molecular Markers Associated With Orobanche Resistance In Sunflower App 20190085413 - Gao; Wenxiang ; et al.	2019-03-21
Endpoint zygosity assay to detect Rf4 gene in maize Grant 10,214,783 - Ren , et al. Feb	2019-02-26
Maize cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) C-type restorer RF4 gene, molecular markers and their use Grant 10,117,411 - Ren , et al. November 6, 2	2018-11-06
MAIZE CYTOPLASMIC MALE STERILITY (CMS) S-TYPE RESTORER GENE Rf3 App 20180230485 - REN; Ruihua ; et al.	2018-08-16
MAIZE CYTOPLASMIC MALE STERILITY (CMS) S-TYPE RESTORER Rf3 GENE, MOLECULAR MARKERS AND THEIR USE App 20180228105 - REN; Ruihua ; et al.	2018-08-16
Maize cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) S-type restorer gene Rf3 Grant 9,920,331 - Ren , et al. March 20, 2	2018-03-20
Maize cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) S-type restorer Rf3 gene, molecular markers and their use Grant 9,883,643 - Ren , et al. February 6, 2	2018-02-06
Markers linked to reniform nematode resistance Grant 9,840,744 - Buyyarapu , et al. December 12, 2	2017-12-12
Endpoint Zygosity Assay To Detect RF4 Gene In Maize App 20160355894 - REN; Ruihua ; et al.	2016-12-08
MAIZE CYTOPLASMIC MALE STERILITY (CMS) S-TYPE RESTORER GENE Rf3 App 20150307896 - REN; Ruihua ; et al.	2015-10-29
MAIZE CYTOPLASMIC MALE STERILITY (CMS) S-TYPE RESTORER Rf3 GENE, MOLECULAR MARKERS AND THEIR USE App 20150189843 - REN; Ruihua ; et al.	2015-07-09
Genetic Loci Associated With Gray Leaf Spot In Maize App 20150167105 - Mammadov; Jafar ; et al.	2015-06-18
Markers Linked To Reniform Nematode Resistance App 20140283212 - Buyyarapu; Ramesh ; et al.	2014-09-18
Markers Linked To Reniform Nematode Resistance App 20140283213 - Buyyarapu; Ramesh ; et al.	2014-09-18
Endpoint Zygosity Assay To Detect RF4 Gene In Maize App 20140024037 - REN; Ruihua ; et al.	2014-01-23
Maize Cytoplasmic Male Sterility (cms) C-type Restorer Rf4 Gene, Molecular Markers And Their Use App 20120090047 - Ren; Ruihua ; et al.	2012-04-12

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.