Ren, Ke
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Ren, Ke. Ren, Ke has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "NOVOCRAFT"
- Company Aliases
- Ke Ren
- Ren, Ke
- ke ren
- REN; Ke - Guilin CN
- Ren; Ke - Zhejiang CN
- Ren; Ke - Guilin CN
| Entity Type | INDIVIDUAL |
| Address | Room 110, No. 8 Xili South Road, Nanshan District Shenzhen, Guangdong CHINA 518055 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| METHOD OF PREPARING AN ORGANIC-INORGANIC HYBRID NANOFLOWER 20220042005 - 17/497899 WU; Xiaoli ; et al. | 2022-02-10 |
| ORGANIC-INORGANIC HYBRID NANOFLOWER AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF 20210230574 - 16/991660 WU; Xiaoli ; et al. | 2021-07-29 |
| Bow shackle D964,152 - D/715,853 Yu , et al. September 20, 2 | 2022-09-20 |
| Organic-inorganic hybrid nanoflower and preparation method thereof 11,174,476 - 16/991,660 Wu , et al. November 16, 2 | 2021-11-16 |
| Pulley assembly D920,083 - D/715,851 Yu , et al. May 25, 2 | 2021-05-25 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"NOVOCRAFT" 98067352 |
NOVOCRAFT 2023-06-30 |
"TRANSNOVO" 98064797 |
TRANSNOVO 2023-06-29 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 