Trademark applications and grants for Refine L L C. Refine L L C has 7 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "PYYNG"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
NONAUGMENTIVE MASTOPEXY 20170196672 - 15/413272 Guterman; Lee R. | 2017-07-13 |
MINIMALLY INVASIVE BREAST LIFT METHOD WITH A SUPERIOR TISSUE SUPPORT AND AN INFERIOR ANCHOR 20160242899 - 14/979460 Lee; Michael J. ;   et al. | 2016-08-25 |
NONAUGMENTIVE MASTOPEXY 20160151138 - 14/942839 Guterman; Lee R. | 2016-06-02 |
MINIMALLY INVASIVE TISSUE SUPPORT 20150327988 - 14/721957 Bishop; Gordon ;   et al. | 2015-11-19 |
NONAUGMENTIVE MASTOPEXY 20150289969 - 14/752583 Guterman; Lee R. | 2015-10-15 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "PYYNG" 87019269 |
PYYNG 2016-04-29 |
![]() "PYYNG" 87019253 |
PYYNG 2016-04-29 |
![]() "PYYNG" 87019264 |
PYYNG 2016-04-29 |
![]() "REFINE" 86641312 |
REFINE 2015-05-26 |
![]() "YODELAY" 86641325 |
YODELAY 2015-05-26 |
![]() "REFINE" 4880652 86641316 |
REFINE 2015-05-26 |
![]() "ALURE REFINE" 3577690 77393299 |
ALURE REFINE 2008-02-10 |
NCAGE Code | 73C95 | REFINE, LLC |
CAGE Code | 73C95 | REFINE, LLC |
DUNS | 926566600 | Refine, LLC |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.