Trademark applications and grants for Reeves James W. Reeves James W has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "THE ACCIDENTAL MEDIATOR"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
COTS FOR BABIES 20110113549 - 12/995260 Riddiford; Martin P. ;   et al. | 2011-05-19 |
Cot with stand D609,934 - D/312,998 Riddford , et al. February 16, 2 | 2010-02-16 |
Process for injecting particulate material into a fluidized bed reactor 5,968,460 - 08/623,071 Eastham , et al. October 19, 1 | 1999-10-19 |
Laser bar code reader system for a fuel rod in a boiling water nuclear reactor 5,811,779 - 08/686,500 Gaylord, Jr. , et al. September 22, 1 | 1998-09-22 |
Automated gauging apparatus 4,946,587 - 07/279,008 Reeves , et al. August 7, 1 | 1990-08-07 |
METHOD OF ILMENITE REDUCTION 3,850,615 - 05/305,082 Reeves November 26, 1 | 1974-11-26 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "THE ACCIDENTAL MEDIATOR" 4218794 85305255 |
THE ACCIDENTAL MEDIATOR 2011-04-26 |
NCAGE Code | 4CSZ2 | REEVES JAMES W!DBA CONFLICT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
CAGE Code | 4CSZ2 | REEVES, JAMES W CONFLICT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
DUNS | 623014813 | REEVES, JAMES W |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.