Reese; H. William
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Reese; H. William.The latest application filed is for "attachable catheter".
- Reese; H. William - Tempe AZ
- Reese; H. William - Mesa AZ
Trademarks
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Attachable catheter Grant 6,482,184 - Christensen , et al. November 19, 2 | 2002-11-19 |
| Post-surgical anesthesia at a continuous and progressively decreasing administration rate Grant RE35,192 - Reese March 26, 1 | 1996-03-26 |
| Double threaded arthrodesis screw Grant 5,409,486 - Reese April 25, 1 | 1995-04-25 |
| Bone clamp and installation tool Grant 5,370,646 - Reese , et al. December 6, 1 | 1994-12-06 |
| Post-surgical anesthesia at a continuous and progressively decreasing administration rate Grant 5,078,679 - Reese January 7, 1 | 1992-01-07 |
| Surgical irrigation apparatus Grant 4,892,526 - Reese January 9, 1 | 1990-01-09 |
| Osteotomy appliances and method Grant 4,750,481 - Reese June 14, 1 | 1988-06-14 |
| Bone handling apparatus and method Grant 4,688,561 - Reese August 25, 1 | 1987-08-25 |
| Osteotomy appliances and method Grant 4,627,425 - Reese December 9, 1 | 1986-12-09 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 