Realty and Industrial Corporation
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Realty and Industrial Corporation.The latest application filed is for "justifying text writing composing machine".
- Realty and Industrial Corporation - Morristown NJ
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Justifying text writing composing machine Grant 4,273,455 - Gubelmann, deceased , et al. June 16, 1 | 1981-06-16 |
| Electronic typographical display device with justification feature Grant 4,207,612 - Grier , et al. June 10, 1 | 1980-06-10 |
| Electronic typographic apparatus Grant 4,153,940 - Grier , et al. May 8, 1 | 1979-05-08 |
| Proportional spacing and electronic typographic apparatus Grant 4,054,948 - Grier , et al. October 18, 1 | 1977-10-18 |
| Justifying, text writing reproducing machine Grant 3,945,480 - Gubelmann, deceased , et al. March 23, 1 | 1976-03-23 |
| Carry Mechanisms For Calculating Machines Grant 3,655,953 - Gubelmann, deceased , et al. April 11, 1 | 1972-04-11 |
| NCAGE Code | 81455 | REALTY AND INDUSTRIAL CORP |
| NCAGE Code | 81456 | REALTY AND INDUSTRIAL CORP |
| CAGE Code | 81456 | REALTY AND INDUSTRIAL CORP |
| CAGE Code | 81455 | REALTY AND INDUSTRIAL CORP |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 