Raymedica Inc

USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings

Trademark applications and grants for Raymedica Inc. Raymedica Inc has 3 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "NASYS"

Company Profile

Raymedica, Inc.
Raymedica, Inc. -

Trademarks Patents

Patent Applications

Patent Application	Date
Prosthetic spinal disc nucleus with elevated swelling rate 20060237877 - 11/472741 Bain; Allison C. ; et al.	2006-10-26
Ultrasonic cutting system with protective sheet 20040079208 - 10/280943 Carlson, John V. ; et al.	2004-04-29
Self-transitioning spinal disc anulus occlusion device and method of use 20040002764 - 10/426424 Gainor, John ; et al.	2004-01-01
Spinal disc anulus occlusion device and method of use 20040002763 - 10/185832 Phillips, Anthony C. ; et al.	2004-01-01
Prosthetic spinal disc nucleus having a shape change characteristic 20020183848 - 10/201838 Ray, Charles D. ; et al.	2002-12-05

Patent Grants & Applications

Trademark Applications

Mark Image Registration \| Serial	Trademark Application Date
"NASYS" 78960911	NASYS 2006-08-25
"NUCLEUS ARTHROPLASTY" 78923368	NUCLEUS ARTHROPLASTY 2006-07-06
"SPINALIFE" 75621533	SPINALIFE 1999-01-15

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.