loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Rash; Randal.The latest application filed is for "led light with a diffracting lens".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Led Light With A Diffracting Lens App 20100002435 - Rash; Randal | 2010-01-07 |
Two piece view port and light housing with swivel light Grant 7,552,693 - MacDonald , et al. June 30, 2 | 2009-06-30 |
Two piece view port and light housing with integrated ballast and high intensity discharge lamp Grant 7,458,330 - MacDonald , et al. December 2, 2 | 2008-12-02 |
Underwater light with diffuser App 20080130304 - Rash; Randal ;   et al. | 2008-06-05 |
Two piece view port and light housing with swivel light App 20080092794 - MacDonald; Ian ;   et al. | 2008-04-24 |
Two piece view port and light housing with swivel light Grant 7,305,929 - MacDonald , et al. December 11, 2 | 2007-12-11 |
Two Piece View Port And Light Housing With Swivel Light App 20070215027 - MacDonald; Ian ;   et al. | 2007-09-20 |
Two piece view port and light housing with integrated ballast and high intensity disharge lamp App 20070209566 - MacDonald; Ian ;   et al. | 2007-09-13 |
Two piece view port and light housing App 20070137544 - MacDonald; Ian M. ;   et al. | 2007-06-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.