Rao; Minghu
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Rao; Minghu.The latest application filed is for "prostration-type bicycle".
- Rao; Minghu - Auckland NZ
- Rao; Minghu - Shanghai CN
- Rao; Minghu - Howick AU
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Prostration-type bicycle Grant 9,815,519 - Zhou , et al. November 14, 2 | 2017-11-14 |
| Prostration-type dual drive bicycle Grant 9,815,518 - Zhou , et al. November 14, 2 | 2017-11-14 |
| Crawling exerciser Grant 9,630,056 - Rao April 25, 2 | 2017-04-25 |
| Elliptical prone exerciser Grant 9,498,674 - Zhou , et al. November 22, 2 | 2016-11-22 |
| Prostration-type Bicycle App 20160244123 - Zhou; Lisha ; et al. | 2016-08-25 |
| Prostration-type Dual Drive Bicycle App 20160229483 - Zhou; Lisha ; et al. | 2016-08-11 |
| Elliptical Prone Exerciser App 20150283425 - Zhou; Lisha ; et al. | 2015-10-08 |
| Crawling Exerciser App 20150065311 - RAO; Minghu | 2015-03-05 |
| Crawling Exerciser App 20120244998 - RAO; Minghu | 2012-09-27 |
| Prostrate grabbling exercise apparatus Grant 7,998,043 - Zhou , et al. August 16, 2 | 2011-08-16 |
| Prostrate Grabbling Exercise Apparatus App 20100248919 - Zhou; Lisha ; et al. | 2010-09-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 