Ramesh Kumar; Pruthvithej

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ramesh Kumar; Pruthvithej.The latest application filed is for "single sign-on (sso) user techniques using client side encryption and decryption".

Company Profile

2.2.3

Ramesh Kumar; Pruthvithej - Bangalore IN

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Single Sign-on (sso) User Techniques Using Client Side Encryption And Decryption App 20220166765 - Pattar; Nagaraj ; et al.	2022-05-26
Single sign-on techniques using client side encryption and decryption Grant 11,283,789 - Pattar , et al. March 22, 2	2022-03-22
Single Sign-on Techniques Using Client Side Encryption And Decryption App 20210258298 - Pattar; Nagaraj ; et al.	2021-08-19
Auto inline enrollment of time-based one-time password (TOTP) for multi-factor authentication Grant 10,812,473 - Ramesh Kumar , et al. October 20, 2	2020-10-20
Auto Inline Enrollment Of Time-based One-time Password (totp) For Multi-factor Authentication App 20190386981 - Ramesh Kumar; Pruthvithej ; et al.	2019-12-19

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.