Ram Rakhyani; Anil
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ram Rakhyani; Anil.The latest application filed is for "intraocular device with wirelessly coupled auxiliary electronics".
- Ram Rakhyani; Anil - San Jose CA
- Ram Rakhyani; Anil - Union City CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Intraocular device with wirelessly coupled auxiliary electronics Grant 11,364,109 - Basinger , et al. June 21, 2 | 2022-06-21 |
| Flexible cable assembly for medical implantation Grant 11,324,944 - Kuiper , et al. May 10, 2 | 2022-05-10 |
| Intraocular Device With Wirelessly Coupled Auxiliary Electronics App 20210015603 - Basinger; Brooke C. ; et al. | 2021-01-21 |
| Intraocular device with wirelessly coupled auxiliary electronics Grant 10,820,987 - Basinger , et al. November 3, 2 | 2020-11-03 |
| Intraocular Device With Wirelessly Coupled Auxiliary Electronics App 20190000611 - Basinger; Brooke C. ; et al. | 2019-01-03 |
| Intraocular device with wirelessly coupled auxiliary electronics Grant 10,076,408 - Basinger , et al. September 18, 2 | 2018-09-18 |
| Intraocular Device With Wirelessly Coupled Auxiliary Electronics App 20170367815 - Basinger; Brooke C. ; et al. | 2017-12-28 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 