Rajagopalan, Ananya
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Rajagopalan, Ananya. Rajagopalan, Ananya has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "PHEAL"
- Company Aliases
- Rajagopalan, Jayendar
- jayendar rajagopalan
- Rajagopalan; Jayendar - Newcastle WA
| State Incorporated | |
| Entity Type | |
| Address | 9205 171st Avenue NE Redmond, WASHINGTON UNITED STATES 98052 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Feed forward control of switching regulator 8,106,639 - 12/136,010 Ju , et al. January 31, 2 | 2012-01-31 |
| Internally compensated differential amplifier 7,504,888 - 11/862,006 Ju , et al. March 17, 2 | 2009-03-17 |
| Apparatus and method for loop adjustment for a DC/DC switching regulator 7,495,423 - 11/397,424 Knight , et al. February 24, 2 | 2009-02-24 |
| Apparatus and method for three-phase buck-boost regulation 7,391,190 - 11/397,588 Rajagopalan June 24, 2 | 2008-06-24 |
| Discrete-time amplitude control of voltage-controlled oscillator 6,909,336 - 10/654,318 Rajagopalan , et al. June 21, 2 | 2005-06-21 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"PHEAL" 88128435 |
PHEAL 2018-09-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 