loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Radisch, Jr.; Herbert R..The latest application filed is for "implantable medical devices comprising bio-degradable alloys".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Traction balloon Grant 8,945,047 - McAuley , et al. February 3, 2 | 2015-02-03 |
Implantable Medical Devices Comprising Bio-degradable Alloys App 20120279881 - Janko; Gordon F. ;   et al. | 2012-11-08 |
Implantable medical devices comprising bio-degradable alloys Grant 8,246,762 - Janko , et al. August 21, 2 | 2012-08-21 |
Platinum Enhanced Alloy and Intravascular or Implantable Medical Devices Manufactured Therefrom App 20120004718 - Craig; Charles H. ;   et al. | 2012-01-05 |
Medical device systems Grant 8,043,259 - Radisch, Jr. , et al. October 25, 2 | 2011-10-25 |
Medical device systems Grant 8,043,311 - Radisch, Jr. , et al. October 25, 2 | 2011-10-25 |
Device and method for collapsing an angioplasty balloon Grant 7,879,005 - Wu , et al. February 1, 2 | 2011-02-01 |
Implantable Medical Devices Comprising Bio-degradable Alloys App 20100174367 - JANKO; Gordon F. ;   et al. | 2010-07-08 |
Traction Balloon App 20090281490 - McAuley; Steven A. ;   et al. | 2009-11-12 |
Traction balloon Grant 7,566,319 - McAuley , et al. July 28, 2 | 2009-07-28 |
Device and method for collapsing an angioplasty balloon Grant 7,285,109 - Wu , et al. October 23, 2 | 2007-10-23 |
Apparatus for supporting a segmented blade on a balloon catheter Grant 7,172,609 - Radisch, Jr. February 6, 2 | 2007-02-06 |
Segmented balloon catheter blade Grant 7,011,670 - Radisch, Jr. March 14, 2 | 2006-03-14 |
Single lumen rapid-exchange catheter Grant 6,730,107 - Kelley , et al. May 4, 2 | 2004-05-04 |
Segmented balloon catheter blade Grant 6,632,231 - Radisch, Jr. October 14, 2 | 2003-10-14 |
Method of using neovascularization catheter Grant 6,296,651 - Lary , et al. October 2, 2 | 2001-10-02 |
Neovascularization catheter Grant 6,117,153 - Lary , et al. September 12, 2 | 2000-09-12 |
Neovascularization catheter Grant 5,800,450 - Lary , et al. September 1, 1 | 1998-09-01 |
Method for manufacturing a high strength angioplasty balloon Grant 5,746,968 - Radisch, Jr. May 5, 1 | 1998-05-05 |
Method for manufacturing an atherectomy cutter having a positive angle of attack Grant 5,742,019 - Radisch, Jr. April 21, 1 | 1998-04-21 |
Angioplasty balloon with light incisor Grant 5,624,433 - Radisch, Jr. April 29, 1 | 1997-04-29 |
Anatomical guide wire Grant 5,295,493 - Radisch, Jr. March 22, 1 | 1994-03-22 |
Collapsible folding angioplasty balloon Grant 5,226,887 - Farr , et al. July 13, 1 | 1993-07-13 |
Guide wire with integral angioplasty balloon Grant 5,209,727 - Radisch, Jr. , et al. May 11, 1 | 1993-05-11 |
Reinforced tubing Grant 5,101,682 - Radisch, Jr. , et al. April 7, 1 | 1992-04-07 |
Atherectomy systems and methods Grant 5,026,384 - Farr , et al. June 25, 1 | 1991-06-25 |
Method of manufacturing a cutter for atherectomy device Grant 4,942,788 - Farr , et al. July 24, 1 | 1990-07-24 |
Rotatable cutter for the lumen of a blood vesel Grant 4,895,166 - Farr , et al. January 23, 1 | 1990-01-23 |
Cutter for atherectomy device Grant 4,887,613 - Farr , et al. December 19, 1 | 1989-12-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.