loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Radcliffe, Gail E..The latest application filed is for "systems and methods for generating fluid samples having select concentration of particles".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Systems and methods for generating fluid samples having select concentration of particles App 20040219073 - Radcliffe, Gail E. ;   et al. | 2004-11-04 |
Methods for collecting fluid samples having select concentrations of particles Grant 6,634,244 - Radcliffe , et al. October 21, 2 | 2003-10-21 |
Methods for stool sample preparation App 20020164631 - Shuber, Anthony P. ;   et al. | 2002-11-07 |
Methods for stool sample preparation Grant 6,406,857 - Shuber , et al. June 18, 2 | 2002-06-18 |
Methods for collecting fluid samples having select concentrations of particles App 20020040610 - Radcliffe, Gail E. ;   et al. | 2002-04-11 |
Systems for collecting fluid samples having select concentrations of particles Grant 6,318,190 - Radcliffe , et al. November 20, 2 | 2001-11-20 |
Quality control for cytochemical assays Grant 6,281,004 - Bogen , et al. August 28, 2 | 2001-08-28 |
Methods for stool sample preparation Grant 6,268,136 - Shuber , et al. July 31, 2 | 2001-07-31 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.