R. Alkan & Cie

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for R. Alkan & Cie.The latest application filed is for "method of coating composite material parts with a refractory and/or metallic product".

Company Profile

0.22.0

R. Alkan & Cie - FR FR
R. Alkan & Cie. - Valenton FR
R. Alkan & Cie - Valenton FR
R. Alkan & Cie - Paris FR

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Method of coating composite material parts with a refractory and/or metallic product Grant 5,246,649 - Mattei , et al. September 21, 1	1993-09-21
Device for carrying and releasing a load such as a missile Grant 4,870,885 - Grosselin , et al. October 3, 1	1989-10-03
Modular devices for loading cartridges on board aircraft Grant 4,682,529 - Duclos , et al. July 28, 1	1987-07-28
Device for rapid fixing and removal of a loader to and from an aircraft carrying device Grant 4,601,445 - Duclos , et al. July 22, 1	1986-07-22
Method of grafting a metal reinforcing member in a structure of composite fibre-resin material Grant 4,530,147 - Mattei , et al. July 23, 1	1985-07-23
Coupling device for a belt with automatic snap-locking and ejection Grant 4,468,843 - Duclos , et al. September 4, 1	1984-09-04
Safety lock for a carrying and jettisoning device for loads transported under aircraft Grant 4,416,437 - Hasquenoph , et al. November 22, 1	1983-11-22
Revolving-cylinder jettison device for transporting and releasing buoys on and from aircraft Grant 4,397,433 - Guitaut , et al. August 9, 1	1983-08-09
Central-controlled devices for carrying and wedging loads under aircraft Grant 4,318,561 - Hasquenoph , et al. March 9, 1	1982-03-09
Kinetic energy absorber Grant 4,223,763 - Duclos , et al. September 23, 1	1980-09-23
Device for locking to fixed supports loads carried under aircraft Grant 4,202,576 - Hasquenoph , et al. May 13, 1	1980-05-13
Device for jettisoning a load in two different ways Grant 4,173,366 - Mattei , et al. November 6, 1	1979-11-06
Automatic load carrier and jettisoning system with built-in hoisting means Grant 4,168,047 - Hasquenoph , et al. September 18, 1	1979-09-18
Automatic hanging and wedging device for aircraft loads Grant 4,129,271 - Hasquenoph , et al. December 12, 1	1978-12-12
Dual-purpose ejector for aircraft load jettisoning mechanism Grant 4,088,287 - Hasquenoph , et al. May 9, 1	1978-05-09
Automatic release and ejection locking mechanism Grant 4,071,271 - Bourrie , et al. January 31, 1	1978-01-31
Automatic hanging and wedging device for aircraft loads Grant 3,954,233 - Hasquenoph , et al. May 4, 1	1976-05-04
Electromechanical device cum manual control of safety outfit boxes on aircrafts Grant 3,942,828 - Bourrie , et al. March 9, 1	1976-03-09
Remote electrical transmission system Grant 3,932,714 - Guimier , et al. January 13, 1	1976-01-13
Device For Steadying Loads Suspended From Aircrafts Grant 3,854,680 - Hasquenoph , et al. December 17, 1	1974-12-17
Aircraft Load Ejector Grant 3,756,545 - Coutin September 4, 1	1973-09-04
Door Lock With Automatic And Emergency Control System Grant 3,753,316 - Savarieau , et al. August 21, 1	1973-08-21

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.