Quinn; Mitchell N.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Quinn; Mitchell N..The latest application filed is for "rootkit detection in a computer network".
- Quinn; Mitchell N. - Raleigh NC US
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Systems and methods for automated memory and thread execution anomaly detection in a computer network Grant 8,984,331 - Quinn March 17, 2 | 2015-03-17 |
| Rootkit Detection in a Computer Network App 20150074808 - QUINN; Mitchell N. | 2015-03-12 |
| Automated malware detection and remediation Grant 8,707,427 - Hooks , et al. April 22, 2 | 2014-04-22 |
| Systems and Methods for Automated Memory and Thread Execution Anomaly Detection in a Computer Network App 20140068326 - Quinn; Mitchell N. | 2014-03-06 |
| Systems and methods for automated data anomaly correction in a computer network Grant 8,104,087 - Quinn , et al. January 24, 2 | 2012-01-24 |
| Automated Malware Detection and Remediation App 20110247071 - Hooks; David E. ; et al. | 2011-10-06 |
| Systems and Methods for Automated Data Anomaly Correction in a Computer Network App 20090177913 - Quinn; Mitchell N. ; et al. | 2009-07-09 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 