Pusic; Pavo
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Pusic; Pavo.The latest application filed is for "motorcyclist's air strips ii".
- Pusic; Pavo - Hoboken NJ
- Pusic; Pavo - East Hanover NJ
- Pusic; Pavo - 50000 Dubrovnik YU
- Pusic; Pavo - Dubrovnik YU
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Motorcyclist's air strips II Grant 5,535,446 - Pusic July 16, 1 | 1996-07-16 |
| Motorcyclist's air strips Grant 5,091,992 - Pusic March 3, 1 | 1992-03-03 |
| Electrically operated cylinder valve Grant 5,074,259 - Pusic December 24, 1 | 1991-12-24 |
| Automated electronic postage meter having a direct acess bar code printer Grant 5,065,000 - Pusic November 12, 1 | 1991-11-12 |
| Automated mail collecting and telecommunication machine II Grant 5,025,386 - Pusic * June 18, 1 | 1991-06-18 |
| Hydraulic connecting rod Grant 4,966,109 - Pusic , et al. October 30, 1 | 1990-10-30 |
| Aircraft piloting aid laser landing system Grant 4,925,303 - Pusic May 15, 1 | 1990-05-15 |
| Automated mail collecting and telecommunication machine Grant 4,900,905 - Pusic February 13, 1 | 1990-02-13 |
| Automated fuel pump controlling system Grant 4,900,906 - Pusic February 13, 1 | 1990-02-13 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 