PURISYS LLC
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Purisys Llc. Purisys Llc has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "PURISYS"
- Company Aliases
- PURISYS LLC
- PURISYS LLC - Athens GA US
- Purisys LLC - Athens GA US
- PURISYS, LLC - Athens GA US
| State Incorporated | DELAWARE |
| Entity Type | LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY |
| Address | 1550 OLYMPIC DRIVE ATHENS, GEORGIA UNITED STATES 30601 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| METHODS OF PREPARING SYNTHETIC CANNABINOL AND HOMOLOGS THEREOF 20220274942 - 17/630221 Barr; Charla ; et al. | 2022-09-01 |
| CRYSTALLINE CANNABIGEROL 20220242810 - 17/596537 Zhang; Wen-Chun ; et al. | 2022-08-04 |
| CANNABIDIOL COMPOSITIONS HAVING MODIFIED CANNABINOID PROFILES 20220218651 - 17/273643 Hallow; Daniel M. ; et al. | 2022-07-14 |
| PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF CANNABIDIOL AND DELTA-9-TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL 20210061781 - 16/950357 Dialer; Lukas ; et al. | 2021-03-04 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"PURISYS" 88623475 |
PURISYS 2019-09-19 |
"PURISYS" 88611063 |
PURISYS 2019-09-10 |
| NCAGE Code | 8L1B9 | PURISYS LLC |
| CAGE Code | 8L1B9 | PURISYS LLC |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 