Puckett; Matthew
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Puckett; Matthew.The latest application filed is for "opto-mechanical resonator with two or more frequency modes".
- Puckett; Matthew - Phoenix AZ
- Puckett; Matthew - Omaha NE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Optomechanical structure with corrugated edge Grant 11,408,911 - Krueger , et al. August 9, 2 | 2022-08-09 |
| Optomechanical resonator stabilization for optomechanical devices Grant 11,372,019 - Krueger , et al. June 28, 2 | 2022-06-28 |
| Opto-mechanical Resonator With Two Or More Frequency Modes App 20220057427 - Puckett; Matthew ; et al. | 2022-02-24 |
| Anchor structure for securing optomechanical structure Grant 11,119,114 - Krueger , et al. September 14, 2 | 2021-09-14 |
| Optomechanical Resonator Stabilization For Optomechanical Devices App 20210072279 - Krueger; Neil ; et al. | 2021-03-11 |
| Optomechanical Structure With Corrugated Edge App 20210018531 - Krueger; Neil ; et al. | 2021-01-21 |
| Anchor Structure For Securing Optomechanical Structure App 20210018530 - Krueger; Neil ; et al. | 2021-01-21 |
| Beverage container carry strap Grant D655,090 - Puckett , et al. March 6, 2 | 2012-03-06 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 