Proventure (Far East) Limited
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Proventure (Far East) Limited.The latest application filed is for "skin-hair treatment method and system".
- Proventure (Far East) Limited - Hong Kong N/A HK
- Proventure (Far East), Limited - Far East
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Skin-hair treatment method and system Grant 9,042,993 - Cook , et al. May 26, 2 | 2015-05-26 |
| Skin-hair Treatment Method And System App 20140155976 - Cook; Stuart A. ; et al. | 2014-06-05 |
| Skin-hair treatment method and system Grant 8,655,448 - Cook , et al. February 18, 2 | 2014-02-18 |
| Skin/hair treatment technique Grant 7,305,269 - Cook , et al. December 4, 2 | 2007-12-04 |
| Skin/hair treatment method and system Grant 6,766,199 - Cook , et al. July 20, 2 | 2004-07-20 |
| Stimulator for hair or skin Grant D487,154 - Cook , et al. February 24, 2 | 2004-02-24 |
| Hair treatment device Grant D486,233 - Cook , et al. February 3, 2 | 2004-02-03 |
| Multi-use body treatment device Grant D484,605 - Cook , et al. December 30, 2 | 2003-12-30 |
| Skin treatment device Grant D481,463 - Cook , et al. October 28, 2 | 2003-10-28 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 