PROPULSIVE WING, LLC
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for PROPULSIVE WING, LLC.The latest application filed is for "hybrid axial/cross-flow fan multi-rotor aerial vehicle".
- PROPULSIVE WING, LLC - Elbridge NY
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Hybrid axial/cross-flow fan multi-rotor aerial vehicle Grant 9,783,291 - Kummer , et al. October 10, 2 | 2017-10-10 |
| Hybrid Axial/Cross-Flow Fan Multi-Rotor Aerial Vehicle App 20160009387 - Kummer; Joseph ; et al. | 2016-01-14 |
| Multi-use personal ventilation/filtration system Grant 8,333,816 - Kummer , et al. December 18, 2 | 2012-12-18 |
| Cross-flow Fan Propulsion System App 20120111994 - Kummer; Joseph ; et al. | 2012-05-10 |
| Multi-use personal ventilation/filtration system Grant 7,892,306 - Kummer , et al. February 22, 2 | 2011-02-22 |
| Multi-use Personal Ventilation/filtration System App 20100175556 - Kummer; Joseph ; et al. | 2010-07-15 |
| Multi-use Personal Ventilation/filtration System App 20090078120 - Kummer; Joseph ; et al. | 2009-03-26 |
| NCAGE Code | 4K9G9 | PROPULSIVE WING LLC |
| CAGE Code | 4K9G9 | PROPULSIVE WING, LLC |
| DUNS | 621501712 | PROPULSIVE WING, LLC |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 