Prolinx Inc
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Prolinx Inc. Prolinx Inc has 4 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "ACAPELLA"
- Company Aliases
- Prolinx, Inc.
- Prolinx, Inc. - Bothell WA
- Prolinx Incorporated - Bothell WA
- Prolinx Incorporated - 22322 20th Avenue SE Bothell WA
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Purification of primer extension products 20040072203 - 10/418749 Dix, Connie Kim ; et al. | 2004-04-15 |
| Sensor surfaces for detecting analytes and methods of use 20030032202 - 10/115721 Stolowitz, Mark L. ; et al. | 2003-02-13 |
| Systems and apparatus for the analysis of molecular interactions 20030003018 - 10/115870 Stolowitz, Mark L. ; et al. | 2003-01-02 |
| Sensor surfaces for detecting analytes 20020192722 - 10/116013 Stolowitz, Mark L. ; et al. | 2002-12-19 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"ACAPELLA" 78156098 |
ACAPELLA 2002-08-20 |
"OCTAVE" 76279879 |
OCTAVE 2001-06-27 |
"SEQUENCE SEEKERS" 2625364 75401496 |
SEQUENCE SEEKERS 1997-12-08 |
"MOLECULAR VELCRO" 75324231 |
MOLECULAR VELCRO 1997-07-14 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 