PROLIFIX LIMITED
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Prolifix Limited. Prolifix Limited has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "PROTACK"
- Company Aliases
- PROLIFIX LIMITED
- PROLIFIX LIMITED - Oxfordshire GB
- PROLIFIX LIMITED -
- Prolifix Limited - Abingdon GB
- Prolifix Limited -
| State Incorporated | ENGLAND |
| Entity Type | COMPANY |
| Address | 91 Milton Park Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX12 4RY UNITED KINGDOM |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Carbamic acid compounds comprising a sulfonamide linkage as HDAC inhibitors 20050107445 - 10/811332 Watkins, Clare J. ; et al. | 2005-05-19 |
| Transcription factor - E2F-5 20030022260 - 10/214188 La Thangue, Nicholas B. ; et al. | 2003-01-30 |
| Interaction between cyclin D1 and steroid receptor co-activators and uses thereof in assays 20020177177 - 09/953031 Bernards, Rene ; et al. | 2002-11-28 |
| Peptide antagonists of DP transcription factors 20020103121 - 09/900147 La Thangue, Nicholas B. ; et al. | 2002-08-01 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"PROTACK" 76201525 |
PROTACK 2001-01-29 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 